I picked up a 50ct. box of one hundred sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to burn up the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is fifty bullets. But I actually need to locate a bullet from the one hundred sixty course that my more mature rifle likes.
H4831 will work within the Swift but not actual properly. You may hardly ever get the pressures you will need for consistency Together with the .223. 760, or H414 might be far better but for some purpose I ain't the largest enthusiast of most ball powders.
Can they be interchanged without having concerns other then applying standard load practices when switching from ton to great deal?
With the 154 grain Hornady SP while in the 280, H4831 gave me superior groups and very good velocity, but Rottweil R905 includes a noticeably greater velocity and supplies marginally improved accuracy. With Swift one hundred fifty grain Sciroccos inside the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave great precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally superior. Consequently, in Each and every of those cases I went with A further powder, but I will surely dislike to divest myself with the H4831.
The sole big difference as I know it would be that the SC was intended to function via powder steps improved (which it does). The for a longer period grains never feed very well in the least in a few measures. Thats my 02 :grin:
Liberalism; The impossible but acknowledged notion that it is totally doable to select up a turd via the clean conclusion.
I don't love to operate up a load applying 1 great deal of powder h4831sc then have to operate up yet again for the reason that I operate out and also have to begin utilizing a new whole lot range.
Anyhow, I wished to give some 7828SC a try to lower a lot of the compression. What a mistake, I couldn't get this powder to shoot correctly or develop the velocities I get with conventional 7828.
I could stack em in one hole but I wasn’t content with the velocity. After months, I got lucky and caught some H1000 on-line and of course compensated a little bit more. The incredibly upcoming week at a gun clearly show a man had an entire situation of H1000 for $40 for every 1lb. I fail to remember exactly how much, but While using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a delicate load.
Why would I point out this? What exactly is my issue? I'm unsure that there's a true legitimate h4831sc load data stage aside from what is well-known with most hasn't been preferred with me whatsoever in these conditions. Do I just Have got a powder jinx or something? Simply to tell you about how insane I really am, tomorrow I am assortment screening a good friends new .
Kansas Metropolis, MO I'd grab whichever is available at the moment. I’ve utilised h4831sc the two although with my head over to load and didn’t see anything at all different functionality intelligent.
Soon after studying this text (and plenty of Many others, but this one is the most data driven with numerous accredited shooters) I have stopped worrying about touching or getting within a magical distance in the lands, and began loading where I could optimize multiple elements of a load. Just my .02, hopefully you will get a little something to work for ya.
A lot of the old Lyman data just stated IMR 4831, which was surplus armed service powder and now newer mfg as H4831.
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Possess a minimal source of Varget, as well as a good deal much more obtainable H4831SC. I shoot fifty five gr. loads Virtually solely, for the reason that that may be just what the rifles shoot the ideal.